Creative Speculation

You show that you'd rather make a case about who was with Jackie, based on an interview that was supposed to track what this OP video addressed. This is what people do when they tend to want to read "the" historical account, and not accounts dealing with the committees who were supposed to have weighed evidence. After all, a second hand account in an oral interview is better than missing brain mass.

You post this kind of stuff often here, so anything that connects the committees that had or did not have evidence that was accounted for by pathologist is just crap to you. That's an ideologue for you...

I'll try one more time… The autopsy's pathology on the brain and the removal of it is missing is based on direct interviews with three pathologists, one of them being the most credible in the revelation of missing evidence. Your account of an oral interview has nothing to do with that. It has nothing to do with Parkland Medical Staff testimony in 1964, or the accounting of exit wounds and damage to JFK's head, which was ruined by pre-autopsy surgery, versus autopsy photos. Go back to time marker 13 minutes to see what was actually done from Andrews Air Force Base to Bethesda's morgue at 8 PM. Or, don't… It's really up to you anyway.

So, the account of an oral interview convinces you a coffin was always accompanied. And, from trauma room one until the ARRB's interviews, you are therefore convinced with or not interested in that half the brain mass was missing. Well, the evidence regarding post-post-mortum surgery by Dr. James J Humes, lead Navy pathologist shows differently. Dr. Humes denied removing the scull cap and brain tissue. Three pathologist participated in examination of the brain and the evidence in Bethesda showed that the scull cap was opened by someone between the time the body arrived at 6:35 pm and autopsy 8 PM. Dr. Humes acknowledge at Bethesda morgue, surgery was performed at the top of the scull. The morgue audience did not know that Humes pre-autopsy surgery caused incredible damage. He was engaging in defensive behavior. Then panicking, admitted in Bethesda, "Well, I see it too". This was pointed out in the book, "Best Evidence, by Dr. David Lipton.

Do you ever read anything on this board that isn't placed there by those not of the same opinion as you? Not that I've ever seen.

Reading is good, Bolo Boffin. So is reading for understanding.