Creative Speculation

By comparing the large number of videos from all around the buildings to videos of actual controlled demolitions. And by the way, it's questions like this that make it impossible to take you seriously.

How do I know there were no seismic events remotely resembling what would be expected if there were controlled demolitions? Because experts who have studied those records say, "There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers."

How do I know there were no columns and beams cut by explosives? Because the FEMA Building Performance Analysis Team, which consisted mostly of private engineers who volunteered to search the rubble for clues to what happened, did not find any such thing, and there should have been LOTS of it if there was a controlled demolition.

> Car and truck bombings would not have instituted the airport security measures.

You still don't understand the nature of your own "just so" stories. You're just assuming that, since that's what happened, it must have been an intentional result of the plot that you also just assume.

> There's no need to bribe or intimidate anyone. If you control the people at the top of the investigation (such as Philip Zelikow) then they get to decide what's investigated and what's not, who investigates what, what's plausible and what's not, and which lines of inquiry are unproductive.

Bullshit, and a good example is the independent engineers mentioned above who were tasked with finding any clues they could about what happened. To explain why they didn't find any evidence whatsoever of your imaginary controlled demolition, you have to include them in your imaginary conspiracy to cover up. The spiraling delusions of conspiracy theories require such spiraling, slanderous but baseless accusations. You just make the conspiracy as big as it needs to be to protect your delusions.

> Also, as usual, you didn't answer the questions.

Which question did I not answer -- the one about, "What's complicated about bringing down the towers?" You're asking what's complicated about rigging two huge, 24x7-occupied office buildings for a top-down type of demolition that's never been done before, and hope nobody notices, nothing goes wrong, and everybody who needs to help you cover it can be coerced into being accessories after the fact of mass murder -- that's your question? Sorry, but I didn't take that as a serious question, either. In fact, it's getting harder and harder to take anything you post seriously. It's all a game to you.