Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Architects & Engineers for Truth! [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)Kathy McGrade, 15:24, without math, no physics, and zero engineering she gives an opinion, "the symmetry is the smoking gun - and the video shows a not symmetrical collapse, and the penthouse collapsed first through WTC 7. The collapse was not symmetrical. The entire video is opinion, no engineering, only talk from a fringe few who can't do engineering, they do woo and are involved in the biggest anti-intellectual movement on earth the failed 911 truth movement. What did it in her fantasy, silent explosives or thermite. How did the MIB get explosives and thermite which leaves no evidence.
Where is Kathy McGrade paper supporting her claims? Why is she unable to understand how WTC 7 was built? Why is she unable to see the big kink in the roof of WTC, which means no symmetry. Does 911 truth ban math, so symmetry is not known.
LOL, 17:07, the biggest BS is Danny Jowenko who calls WTC 7 CD, but WTC 1 and WTC 2 are not - Danny says no CD on the Towers. Danny is 67 percent right, Gage is 100 percent wrong. This is comedy as idiots join Gage's fantasy and lies, as Gage travel club for one, or is it his girl friend too, funded on donations from dumbed down donors.
It gets worse the paranoid conspiracy theorists think Danny was killed because he spoke out - yet, he said no CD on the towers. Conspiracy theorists, 911 truth followers are not the sharpest tools in the box of woo known as 911 truth.
No wonder you can't support any of the opinions with facts and evidence, they have nothing. Zip, a math term for zero.