Creative Speculation

Why can't you supply knowledge to help pilots for truth? Their impossible speed lie was proved wrong with RADAR and video. The facts make the claim of an impossible speed a failed lie to sell DVDs filled with delusions about 911.

911 truth followers can't present evidence to support claims. Claims from pilots for truth remain false.

Can you explain why Flight 175 can't go 590 mph? No, you can only supply verbal support for failed claims - zero support.

Making fun of those murdered by 19 terrorists. Ironically pilots for truth brag about how they can't hit the biggest office building in the world like the terrorist pilot did; and pilots for truth were in a simulator. How do they land on 150 foot wide runways with heavy jets? Why does the leader of pilots for truth not have the PhD of flying, an ATP. I do, why did the pilots for truth founder fail to get the ATP. Do you know? Like Gage's failed followers, with less than 0.1 percent of all engineers, pilots for truth have less than 0.1 percent of all pilots. I wonder if that pilot who went crazy in Jet Blue while flying was a pilots for truth core member.

Anyway, why are 911 truth followers unable to present evidence? Did the dog eat it? Wind blew it away. Where is the "overwhelming" evidence from 911 truth? The bit bucket

What does Boeing say is the structural failure speed of a 767/757? pilots for truth can't find it, can you help them

Boeing built the 767/757 to 1.2Vd, thus the aircraft should maintain control to 580 mph, and as seen on 911, 590 mph for Flight 175.

Flight 77 did not exceed 580 mph, it was only over Vmo for 20 seconds, and then it crashed. Looks like all the planes on 911 that went over Vmo crashed.

Flight 11 was only at Vd at impact, a speed flight tested. Thus the lies of impossible speed don't apply to Flight 11, did you know you support nonsense.

Flight 93 was flown into the ground by terrorists too afraid to face Flight 93 Passengers who figure out 911 in minutes, 12 years faster than you and 911 truth, and pilots for truth. Flight 93 speed is not relevant, all systems were working and any modern airliner at 40 degrees nose low will exceed Mach1 if there is room, and the pilots are not loading up the aircraft.

What is your expertise for flying and aerodynamics.