Creative Speculation

I will certainly never contact you for such a "debate" given the intellectually dishonest tactics you use in a venue where your claims and arguments can be thoroughly scrutinized. After getting your rhetorical butt kicked up and down such venues, of course you'd like a change to a venue where that isn't possible, but I'm having plenty of fun right here.

I haven't done any "formal" debating since high school, but even though that was a long time ago, I distinctly recall that in a formal debate, you are required to define your terms and cite your references. So, in the first place, why should anyone waste time in a "formal debate" with someone who thinks he can win arguments by just inventing his own definitions for technical terms, proclaiming himself to be an authority "certified by the FAA to teach this material," but then proceeds to demonstrate that he doesn't even understand his own arguments, much less anyone elses?

Anyone who still takes you seriously hasn't been paying attention, and sorry, Rob, but I am not among that unfortunate crowd.