Creative Speculation

This is the same tactic you used on other forums, you want to debate, but fail to debate. How do you debate a fake Vg diagram? You can't explain this, "by an increase of 20 percent in equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number and constant altitude", how can you debate aerodynamics when you use journalists as your source for false aerodynamic definitions.

You lost the debate, your fake Vg diagram is exposed, video and RADAR prove Flight 175 can fly at 590mph, means your impossible speed is busted. The 11.2g failed physics was exposed, and replaced with 34g, over 30gs off. What can you debate, all your claims are nonsense.

you can't debate here, you are running away, evidence free - why did you lie about your ATP

As predicted, johndoeX wants to debate, and runs away, 13 years after 911, pilots for truth spreading lies about flying, and they brag they can't hit targets in the safety of a simulator which the terrorists hit the first time in a heavy jet - guess the simulator practice the terrorists had in commercial jets helped, but the poor pilots for truth can't fly as good as the terrorists, and they brag about it.