Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]William Seger
(11,046 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:49 AM - Edit history (1)
> Beachy, do you agree with Seger that Vd is a "limit load" defined under FAR Part 25?
Everything I've actually said is still right here where everyone can read it, and yet it seems to be impossible for you to engage in intellectually honest debate. Why is that?
(Edit to add another case in point):
> Psst... Beachy.... that didn't come from a "journalist". It came from the Federal Aviation Regulations.
Of course, the reference was to the journalist saying Vd when he was talking about Vfd, but you knew that. Funny how you can't bring yourself to admit that superbeachnut was right about the 20%, too. It takes serious chutzpah to wave that around while claiming to have won the "debate," while ignoring what it means to your claims. But I guess you know your target market pretty well, huh.