Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)

2. pseudo-science indeed..

Reply to William Seger (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 22, 2014, 05:16 PM

Sep 2014

But I guess that's all you have in the face of structural engineers, chemists, metalurgists, architects and other professionals when using JREF quacks as authorities, eh william!
By the way can you give us just one example of a "gravity driven collapse" where the entire structure was demolished and turned into rubble? Besides of course on 9/11/01.
I thought not!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Newton vs NIST by Jonathan Cole - Japanese [View all] wildbilln864 Sep 2014 OP

Pseudo-science at its worst William Seger Sep 2014 #1

pseudo-science indeed.. wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #2

Yes, I can William Seger Sep 2014 #3

fail again Seger! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #4

Nope William Seger Sep 2014 #5

also structurally.... wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #6

It was "like the WTC towers" (and most other buildings) in the one thing that mattered William Seger Sep 2014 #7

nonsense William! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #8

Really? William Seger Sep 2014 #9

loads yes, depending on what you define as load. wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #10

WTF does that mean? William Seger Sep 2014 #11