Creative Speculation

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)

6. there is no evidence against me!

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 08:54 AM

Sep 2014

there was thermate used along with some other explosive compounds. An investigation is needed to determine what was used with the thermate if that's even still possible by now which I doubt but you have no standing to deny it. Explosions were heard and molten steel was witnessed. We'll "go around this barn again" as many times as I say. As long as you are denying the obvious. Molten steel, witnesses to explosions, etc all support controlled demolition.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WTC 7 Sound Evidence for Explosions by David Chandler - Polish [View all] wildbilln864 Sep 2014 OP

Where Are The Sheep? billhicks76 Sep 2014 #1

but they shouldn't check for demolitions even though it fits the bill. wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #4

Funny William Seger Sep 2014 #2

william, william, william, wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #3

Huh, after I just posted about you not making any progress... William Seger Sep 2014 #5

there is no evidence against me! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #6

Ah, I see, since neither silent high explosives nor instant-cutting thermite fit the facts... William Seger Sep 2014 #7

" more about how "molten steel" is a standard feature of controlled demolitions" wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #8

Ah, I think I get it now William Seger Sep 2014 #9

no. you must still be confused! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #10

Well, you're confusing me William Seger Sep 2014 #11

kicking for the confused. n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #12

Kicking for the impotent 13 years and still nothing brigade! N/t zappaman Nov 2014 #13