Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,262 posts)

7. Ah, I see, since neither silent high explosives nor instant-cutting thermite fit the facts...

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 10:27 AM

Sep 2014

... it must have both? And since you can't find any credible evidence of either, nor can you really explain how this controlled demolition worked, that's why we need a new investigation?

Yup, that's classic Richard Gage, and it's one clue why only illogical and gullible people take him seriously.

We're not likely to make any progress revisiting the "all loud noises are explosions and all explosions are caused by explosives" fuzzy thinking, but tell me more about how "molten steel" is a standard feature of controlled demolitions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WTC 7 Sound Evidence for Explosions by David Chandler - Polish [View all] wildbilln864 Sep 2014 OP

Where Are The Sheep? billhicks76 Sep 2014 #1

but they shouldn't check for demolitions even though it fits the bill. wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #4

Funny William Seger Sep 2014 #2

william, william, william, wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #3

Huh, after I just posted about you not making any progress... William Seger Sep 2014 #5

there is no evidence against me! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #6

Ah, I see, since neither silent high explosives nor instant-cutting thermite fit the facts... William Seger Sep 2014 #7

" more about how "molten steel" is a standard feature of controlled demolitions" wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #8

Ah, I think I get it now William Seger Sep 2014 #9

no. you must still be confused! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #10

Well, you're confusing me William Seger Sep 2014 #11

kicking for the confused. n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #12

Kicking for the impotent 13 years and still nothing brigade! N/t zappaman Nov 2014 #13