Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,262 posts)

11. Well, you're confusing me

Reply to wildbilln864 (Reply #10)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 09:00 PM

Sep 2014

Was it silent explosives, delayed-action explosives, or instant-cutting thermite? It seems to me you're saying that since none of those things exist, maybe it was all three?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WTC 7 Sound Evidence for Explosions by David Chandler - Polish [View all] wildbilln864 Sep 2014 OP

Where Are The Sheep? billhicks76 Sep 2014 #1

but they shouldn't check for demolitions even though it fits the bill. wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #4

Funny William Seger Sep 2014 #2

william, william, william, wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #3

Huh, after I just posted about you not making any progress... William Seger Sep 2014 #5

there is no evidence against me! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #6

Ah, I see, since neither silent high explosives nor instant-cutting thermite fit the facts... William Seger Sep 2014 #7

" more about how "molten steel" is a standard feature of controlled demolitions" wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #8

Ah, I think I get it now William Seger Sep 2014 #9

no. you must still be confused! wildbilln864 Sep 2014 #10

Well, you're confusing me William Seger Sep 2014 #11

kicking for the confused. n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #12

Kicking for the impotent 13 years and still nothing brigade! N/t zappaman Nov 2014 #13