Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 11:24 PM Oct 2014

Bones: The Forensic Evidence of Explosives. [View all]

"...The absence of office furniture and equipment, and much of the Towers’ mass suggests that the Twin Towers did not collapse – they EXPLODED – and were demolished (WTC7). This is THE ONLY LOGICAL EXPLANATION to explain the thousands of tiny human bone fragments scattered about. No simple gravitational collapse, like the one on the official NIST Report, could possibly blast human skeletons to smithereens and deposit those smithereens all over the roof of a neighboring building.

Apart from those on flight 11, who do the other fragments on the Deutsche bank belong to? Where were these people most likely to be at the time of impact and collapse? And how can the gravitational forces of a collapse pulverize – fragmentalize – explode a human body into hundreds of fragments. 200 plus fragments were found from one person. How many fragments were not found from that body – 2,000? Maybe 10,000? But this is the one forensic discussion the mainstream media and the governmental investigative bodies want to avoid.

To be honest – I think an investigation will make little difference to what is already evident: There were fragments – minuscule fragments in the plume that spread all over and beyond the WTC site. This is more evidence – that adds to the already irrefutable proof that the buildings were ‘demolished’. "
http://gumshoenews.com/2014/09/08/bones-the-forensic-evidence-of-explosives/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"THE ONLY LOGICAL EXPLANATION" William Seger Oct 2014 #1
so William... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #3
My first guess would be... William Seger Oct 2014 #4
ok, so... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #5
Take your time William Seger Oct 2014 #6
so do you agree with what I said in post 5 or not? wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #7
So, do you have a point you'd like to make or not? William Seger Oct 2014 #8
thank you...bear with me please... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #9
If you're trying to establish the premises of your argument William Seger Oct 2014 #10
trying to but you want to evade... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #11
WTF? Yes, stuff went everywhere. William Seger Oct 2014 #12
I agree that column buckling was not the predominant failure mode, anyway... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #13
Then you've got a LOT more work to do William Seger Oct 2014 #14
but I do understand how it did happen! wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #15
Wow. zappaman Oct 2014 #2
This place cracks me up, like reading bad fiction. Nt Logical Oct 2014 #17
911 truth, 13 years of nonsense and action... superbeachnut Oct 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Bones: The Forensic Evide...»Reply #0