Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,262 posts)
8. So, do you have a point you'd like to make or not?
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 02:37 PM
Oct 2014

WTF? Yes, it certainly appears that everything in the planes and in the buildings got scattered, but exactly what got scattered exactly how far would be a different issue. If you have some argument you'd like to make about that, then please get on with it, already.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"THE ONLY LOGICAL EXPLANATION" William Seger Oct 2014 #1
so William... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #3
My first guess would be... William Seger Oct 2014 #4
ok, so... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #5
Take your time William Seger Oct 2014 #6
so do you agree with what I said in post 5 or not? wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #7
So, do you have a point you'd like to make or not? William Seger Oct 2014 #8
thank you...bear with me please... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #9
If you're trying to establish the premises of your argument William Seger Oct 2014 #10
trying to but you want to evade... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #11
WTF? Yes, stuff went everywhere. William Seger Oct 2014 #12
I agree that column buckling was not the predominant failure mode, anyway... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #13
Then you've got a LOT more work to do William Seger Oct 2014 #14
but I do understand how it did happen! wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #15
Wow. zappaman Oct 2014 #2
This place cracks me up, like reading bad fiction. Nt Logical Oct 2014 #17
911 truth, 13 years of nonsense and action... superbeachnut Oct 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Bones: The Forensic Evide...»Reply #8