Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Showing Original Post only (View all)

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 04:11 PM Nov 2014

Mechanical Engineer Tony Szamboti shatters the NIST report [View all]

on 9/11 Free Fall with Andrew Steele



http://noliesradio.org/archives/90903
This show was broadcast October 30, 2014

Tony Szamboti is back to discuss the latest paper that he helped write, titled, “Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports” which consolidates the 9/11 controlled demolition evidence into 25 points for academics and a potential future grand jury to read.

Previous: Tony Szamboti and Gerry B. on new WTC-7 legal action with Atty. William Pepper
http://noliesradio.org/archives/79823
This show was broadcast on April 5, 2014

Guests: Mechanical Engineer Tony Szamboti and Gerry B. will discuss their attorney William Pepper’s letter to Inspector General Todd Zinser asking the I.G. to correct the record about World Trade Center Building 7. Excerpt:

“It was only some years after the issuance of the NIST Report that drawings were released, in response to a FOIA request, revealing that critical structural features in Building 7 were inexplicably missing from consideration in the Report. These critical features included stiffeners, that provided critical girder support, as well as lateral support beams which supported a beam which allegedly buckled.

Only through the omission of any discussion about the stiffeners and the lateral support beams is NIST’s probable collapse sequence possible. With the inclusion of these critical features, NIST’s probable collapse sequence must be ruled out unambiguously. It is the unanimous opinion of the structural engineers who have carefully studied this matter that an independent engineering enquiry would swiftly reach the same conclusion.”

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Mechanical Engineer Tony ...»Reply #0