Creative Speculation

... and furthermore, his arguments are logically sound, unlike Gyro's Law and the other imaginary physics you've posted, or anything yet produced by Gage's "experts." Someone who doesn't even understand Bazant's arguments is in no position to even discuss them intelligently, much less refute them. Calling Bazant an idiot just because he contradicts your imaginary physics tells us something about you, not about Bazant.

As for this video, let me repeat what I said before: To a physicist, the question of whether an impacting object would destroy the impacted object is not answered by silly and invalid analogies. It's just a question of how much energy was involved in the impact and how much would be necessary to do the destruction. A physicist would attempt to estimate the forces and resistances involved in a particular case to answer the question. Like the "professor" in your OP video, you don't seem to grasp that simple and obvious point, yet you call someone who has done exactly that an idiot.