Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: I would like to officially volunteer to be the host of this group. [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)57. oh, here we go again
i dont have time to do this, but iverglas made a claim that i dont get to be a feminst if i prioritize the rights of the lgbt community over straight women.
Quote me, or, with all due respect, hold your peace and refrain from saying things that are not true.
If you don't have time to address something someone has actually said and prefer to make shit up instead, I'm sure there is somewhere you can post that where it will be welcome.
Perhaps you were attempting to offer an example of the real problem here -- which is not what anyone else does or says.
On the point made later in this subthread: am I, as a straight woman who survived an abduction, rape and attempted murder, and as a result (in combination with other experiences), suffer significant post-traumatic stress that colours my perception of the world in every regard, less "oppressed" than a lesbian who has never been a victim of sexual violence or abuse?
Of course lesbians have suffered such victimization. Not all lesbians have. Not all lesbians have been discriminated against in the workplace or housing market on the basis of sexual orientation. Not all lesbians are more oppressed or victimized than any straight woman simply because they are lesbians. Hell, my best lesbian friend comes from a much higher socio-economic status than I do, never had to worry about how she was going to pay for her education, and had no difficulty at all securing a prestigious, well-paid job in government. Yeah, she's Canadian, but hell, she's a woman and a lesbian. Your issues are not actually universal either.
it took a long time for straight feminist to even acknowledge gay feminists in the feminism movement, this is why it is important to me to acknowledge that our priorities may not be the same. while you seek equality in your marriage, i seek the rights to marriage. while pornification may be a big deal to you, it almost doesn't register as particularly important to me. porn, sex-work and visibility of queer women are places that i have most recently found huge difference with feminists in this particular forum.
Well, finally. Your priorities as a lesbian may not be the same as ours as women. Pornification may be a "big deal" to us. Hey, you're not dismissive at all. But ... sex work is somehow a lesbian issue (I'm still failing to see in what different way), but our perspective as straight women is not worth bothering about, I guess. Who might care about the effects of those phenomena on women, or even just straight women, when they (allegedly) affect lesbians differently? Who might want to consider that their perspective should take other women's into account?
You're making it clear. You're privileging the alleged different interests of lesbians (not all lesbians concurring) over the stated and demonstrable interests of vast numbers of women world-wide.
So I see this proposed new group as just a front for that position, and I'd be impressed if someone had just come out and said so.
Quote me, or, with all due respect, hold your peace and refrain from saying things that are not true.
If you don't have time to address something someone has actually said and prefer to make shit up instead, I'm sure there is somewhere you can post that where it will be welcome.
Perhaps you were attempting to offer an example of the real problem here -- which is not what anyone else does or says.
On the point made later in this subthread: am I, as a straight woman who survived an abduction, rape and attempted murder, and as a result (in combination with other experiences), suffer significant post-traumatic stress that colours my perception of the world in every regard, less "oppressed" than a lesbian who has never been a victim of sexual violence or abuse?
Of course lesbians have suffered such victimization. Not all lesbians have. Not all lesbians have been discriminated against in the workplace or housing market on the basis of sexual orientation. Not all lesbians are more oppressed or victimized than any straight woman simply because they are lesbians. Hell, my best lesbian friend comes from a much higher socio-economic status than I do, never had to worry about how she was going to pay for her education, and had no difficulty at all securing a prestigious, well-paid job in government. Yeah, she's Canadian, but hell, she's a woman and a lesbian. Your issues are not actually universal either.
it took a long time for straight feminist to even acknowledge gay feminists in the feminism movement, this is why it is important to me to acknowledge that our priorities may not be the same. while you seek equality in your marriage, i seek the rights to marriage. while pornification may be a big deal to you, it almost doesn't register as particularly important to me. porn, sex-work and visibility of queer women are places that i have most recently found huge difference with feminists in this particular forum.
Well, finally. Your priorities as a lesbian may not be the same as ours as women. Pornification may be a "big deal" to us. Hey, you're not dismissive at all. But ... sex work is somehow a lesbian issue (I'm still failing to see in what different way), but our perspective as straight women is not worth bothering about, I guess. Who might care about the effects of those phenomena on women, or even just straight women, when they (allegedly) affect lesbians differently? Who might want to consider that their perspective should take other women's into account?
You're making it clear. You're privileging the alleged different interests of lesbians (not all lesbians concurring) over the stated and demonstrable interests of vast numbers of women world-wide.
So I see this proposed new group as just a front for that position, and I'd be impressed if someone had just come out and said so.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
there are people that use this forum. and there are people tht never use this forum
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#12
tha is why i have suggested redqueen. she has none and she works with people,
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#18
I'd agree if it weren't for the humongous and not pleasant thread earlier in the week. n/t
Gormy Cuss
Jan 2012
#33
it was settled. i started a thread in gd to make people aware so they could come in and decide
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#34
it has been almost a week. people are aware. no one is saying anything but thumbs up.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#38
No, the focus on actually selecting a host has only been since redqueen started this thread.
Gormy Cuss
Jan 2012
#39
can she apply monday? since not a single person objects? we dont want the "appearance" of rushing
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#40
the SOP is basically done. i think everyone will be able to agree with it. the two issues have
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#45
lol. another poster came up with a resolution to the porn issue. that is the last controversy that
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#47
And that would be because what you posted comes across as incredibly dismissive...
Violet_Crumble
Jan 2012
#55
i would like to express my POV about the events of the last week. i think we can feel good
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#58