Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Maeve

(43,104 posts)
1. Part of the goal would be to vindicate the woman
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 08:29 AM
Apr 2017

To win such a suit means that she would be acknowleged as the victim of a cad, resulting in less humiliation for her and more for him (not that it would be a major problem for him, but still) and this would help restore her prospects. Part of it depends on her social standing; it mattered more to the middle classes than to either upper or lower. And part depends on her age--older marriage was still acceptable and more common than it would be in the post-WWII era.

edited to add--Of course, the money itself would enhance her prospects; a woman with money was always more attractive than a woman without it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Part of the goal would be to vindicate the woman Maeve Apr 2017 #1
One reason for engagement rings Freddie Apr 2017 #2
didn't work out that way for me. unblock Apr 2017 #3
Where did this happen? PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #4
Altoona, PA no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #6
When I got married in 1980 in the state of Michigan, PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #7
That's what I figured too. no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #8
Here's some background TheOther95Percent Apr 2017 #5
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»In 1900, what did it mean...»Reply #1