Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(54,492 posts)
3. didn't work out that way for me.
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 10:17 AM
Apr 2017

somewhat different context as we were actually married 10 years. when we got divorced the it was determined that the wedding rings (along with virtually all our other possessions) were community property subject to an equitable split, but her engagement ring was an individual possession of hers she brought into the marriage, so she got to keep it.

this was the ring my grandmother had gotten engaged with, so needless to say my whole family was quite pissed at her for this.
it was a pretty amicable divorce other than that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Part of the goal would be to vindicate the woman Maeve Apr 2017 #1
One reason for engagement rings Freddie Apr 2017 #2
didn't work out that way for me. unblock Apr 2017 #3
Where did this happen? PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #4
Altoona, PA no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #6
When I got married in 1980 in the state of Michigan, PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #7
That's what I figured too. no_hypocrisy Apr 2017 #8
Here's some background TheOther95Percent Apr 2017 #5
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»In 1900, what did it mean...»Reply #3