Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: I'm a little peeved, to put it lightly [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)29. EDITED - so how many here agree with this characterization of this thread and this group?
Last edited Wed Feb 8, 2012, 08:50 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm bumping the original text of this post down to the bottom to add this, and ask the question in the subject line.
At Wed Feb 8, 2012, 08:33 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
I'm amazed only one person got nuked in that thread
The reason for the alert was:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
You added the following comments:
"What a bunch of fucking bigots we have here."
The reference is to members of the Feminists group at DU, posting in a thread in the Feminists group's forum. That is plain from the post; the subject of the OP is a post in that exact thread.
The fact that it is not a remotely accurate characterization of the discussion in that group is not relevant.
What matters is that it has never been acceptable for DU members to call other DUers, individually or by broad-brush smears, "bigots". That principle has been upheld by juries at DU3 and most DUers hope to see it maintained. Thank you.
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this post at Wed Feb 8, 2012, 04:12 AM, and voted 1-5 to keep it.
Thank you.
I'm amazed only one person got nuked in that thread
Prism
203. I'm amazed only one person got nuked in that thread
Not only is it full of open, almost celebratory transphobia, but it is drenched in a heavy anti-lesbian vibe. Some regular posters do just about everything except outright refer to many DU lesbians as a marauding group of male-identified bull dykes - they just heavily intimate it in their language.
Am I the only one who read that thread and wondered how tombstones weren't aflyin'?
Ridiculous.
What a bunch of fucking bigots we have here.
203. I'm amazed only one person got nuked in that thread
Not only is it full of open, almost celebratory transphobia, but it is drenched in a heavy anti-lesbian vibe. Some regular posters do just about everything except outright refer to many DU lesbians as a marauding group of male-identified bull dykes - they just heavily intimate it in their language.
Am I the only one who read that thread and wondered how tombstones weren't aflyin'?
Ridiculous.
What a bunch of fucking bigots we have here.
The reason for the alert was:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
You added the following comments:
"What a bunch of fucking bigots we have here."
The reference is to members of the Feminists group at DU, posting in a thread in the Feminists group's forum. That is plain from the post; the subject of the OP is a post in that exact thread.
The fact that it is not a remotely accurate characterization of the discussion in that group is not relevant.
What matters is that it has never been acceptable for DU members to call other DUers, individually or by broad-brush smears, "bigots". That principle has been upheld by juries at DU3 and most DUers hope to see it maintained. Thank you.
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this post at Wed Feb 8, 2012, 04:12 AM, and voted 1-5 to keep it.
Thank you.
That work for you, folks?
The members of this group are a bunch of fucking bigots?
For any ignorant souls in the vicinity, "male-identified" HAS FUCK ALL TO DO WITH TRANSGENDERED.
It is a term used to refer to women who identify with THE PATRIARCHY, who see their interests as lying in agreeing with and supporting men who oppose feminists and feminism. Phyllis Schlafly. Anita Bryant. Surely the third-wavers have someone in their living memory they can think of. We have lots of them right here at DU.
God all fucking mighty.
-------------------------------------------------
Sadly, I'm the pefect lightning rod / scapegoat.
So many lies have been posted about me over so many years at this site by a very particular element, there are probably people who actually believe them.
See my post on marriage that I've just bumped up.
The quantity and quality of people by whom one is hated has always seemed to me like a decent measure of one's worth.
And hell, if it wasn't me, it'd be you.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How do you discuss it? For starters, don't refer to people who disagree with you...
TheWraith
Feb 2012
#1
"not quite so tired" me, too.... cause it matters an it is a good subject. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#10
what is interesting is it is the second gay woman kicked off du, thru our forum, not by us..
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#21
EDITED - so how many here agree with this characterization of this thread and this group?
iverglas
Feb 2012
#29
I've got a suggestion, and it's aimed at everyone, including our vindictive alerter...
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#40
IMHO, there's not one vindictive alerter, there are many alerters acting in good faith.
Gormy Cuss
Feb 2012
#46
My starting assumptions could be naive, but I lean toward the vocal minority "theory."
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#37
Except perhaps for a few trolls, the FR folks self identify as anti-Democrat.
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#39
"I invite you to PM me when you're doing the Goddess's work in some thread on DU, will you?"
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#57