Feminists

At Wed Feb 8, 2012, 12:48 PM you sent an alert on the following post:

If you're referring to a certain Canadian...


REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.


YOUR COMMENTS:

"If you're referring to a certain Canadian...
...that one is simply a vicious, toxic personality."

Okay, the group is protected and gets to discuss its *issues* as it chooses.

Does this really, really include discussing other *another DUer* using language like this? -- one whose identity is known to everybody in the group, and anybody outside it who has the slightest knowledge of recent events -- and who is identified by nationality, moreover?

Can one hope not?


JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Wed Feb 8, 2012, 01:10 PM, and voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: The poster should alert on the DU'er he's sniping at directly, and NEVER take pot shots at fellow DU'ers. This is a personal attack, nothing else. DU'er needs to try this again, the right way.

Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Disruptive call out. Counter-intuitive, perhaps, but restraint might be the better way out of this conflict.

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I don't have a clue who might be the one indicated in the post. People need to butt out of the groups and stop trying to run them from the outside.

Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given