Feminists
In reply to the discussion: My thoughts on Neoma's actions (as if they matter at all) [View all]kdmorris
(5,649 posts)Lots of people disagree with me and I would be fine with them being hosts. Disagreement is good for diversity.
You cannot seem to stop fanning the flames. You do not see that iverglas did anything wrong in her treatment of people. From the first time I posted to you on this matter, I tried to tell you that I had no fight with you, but you made it into a fight with me. You have accused me of twisting the facts (when I stated that I could be wrong, that was just my perception). Even when I reiterated that was just how I saw it - you kept posting that I was twisting facts and lying. When I asked that you let it die, that you attempt to reestablish peace in this group, you refused. You posted a snarky post about how I refused to understand instead of attempting to actually re-establish peace.
I do not agree with everything Neoma has done, but she is at least appearing to try to stop this flame war. You are not. You are one of the people who is fanning it the most. And it's pretty sad, because as I said, I have always thought that you are a very nice person when I've had conversations with you before (for YEARS both at DU2 and here).
But you have tied your star to iverglas and that's fine. I do not think that you realize how much she hurts people and that's your prerogative, too. But were you to become host again, I see that sort of blind loyalty to her as a liability rather than an asset. I see a world in which you install iverglas as a host again.
It makes me sad to know that you do not see the pain your friend is causing people and so blindly defend her. But everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)