Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

15. Thank you for your reply.

Reply to The Philosopher (Reply #8)

Sat Mar 17, 2012, 08:13 AM

Mar 2012

"The entire article reads as followed: I have an idea; a group of people don't use my idea; therefore, they're inhuman and need to be destroyed."

That is what I got from most of it. The author seems to want to be in opposition to her perceived enemies more that she wants to stand for something in order to create solidarity. The authors perceived enemies also seem to be those I am willing to fight for and try to give a voice to. Pretty low self-standards if you ask me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why "fun feminism" should be consigned to the rubbish bin [View all] NCTraveler Mar 2012 OP

I really don't know what to think about this. NCTraveler Mar 2012 #1

Here's a discussion on the same article: The Philosopher Mar 2012 #2

Thank you. NCTraveler Mar 2012 #3

I don't blame you for staying out of the other thread, it's toxic. William769 Mar 2012 #5

Honestly, it's an ugly article without any merit. The Philosopher Mar 2012 #8

Thank you for your reply. NCTraveler Mar 2012 #15

I know what to think about it. ZenLefty Mar 2012 #11

Here is what I think. Every discriminated against group has people like this. stevenleser Mar 2012 #30

Fun is good RobertEarl Mar 2012 #4

the author has a few good points but its clouded by her desire to denigrate women La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2012 #6

Agreed, good post. n/t tammywammy Mar 2012 #14

After the other post of this appeared, I brought this up to some of fellow faculty members ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #7

not a fan of this article or author maddezmom Mar 2012 #9

+1. *Feminism TM* n/t Catherina Mar 2012 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #10

It's about the patriarchy to me ismnotwasm Mar 2012 #12

I agree that being a strong woman doesn't make you a feminist Nikia Mar 2012 #16

Julie Bindel, the author of this column, is known to be transphobic and intolerant. yardwork Mar 2012 #17

What a pantload. gkhouston Mar 2012 #18

"I am tired of being told by so-called 3rd-wavers that my feminism is fascist, old hat, irrelevant" Catherina Mar 2012 #19

Best way to get people to listen to you is to insult them. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #20

so maybe the 3rd wavers shouldn't insult her, eh? n/t Scout Mar 2012 #21

She's a member of an increasingly isolated, incoherent, irrelevant minority that is on its way out. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #22

just commenting on the hypocrisy ... author of the article is supposed to avoid name calling, etc. Scout Mar 2012 #23

She's a bigot who denigrates everyone fom young women to transpeople to hetero women Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #24

got it. she must be careful what she says, so others might listen to her. Scout Mar 2012 #26

Actually, it doesn't really matter either way. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #27

Honestly, Scout MadrasT Mar 2012 #25

Julie Bindel is not a second waver. She's in her 40s. She's younger than Obama, who is Gen X. yardwork Mar 2012 #28

+1. Agreed. polly7 Mar 2012 #29

Just like it's hard for those of us who believe the earth is round not to denigrate flat-earthers... stevenleser Mar 2012 #31