Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

obamanut2012

(28,181 posts)
11. LLP -- just saw this related article on my twitter feed
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 04:01 PM
Aug 2012

Quick Hit: The effects of stop + frisk on women
By Lori | Published: August 7, 2012

*Trigger warning* The linked article contains descriptions of harassment and unwanted touching.

Laws don’t always affect all people equally. People of color and LBGTQ people, for example, are disproportionately targeted by laws that criminalize carrying condoms as an (ineffective) way to prevent sex work. And we’ve documented how stop and frisk is executed along racial lines, and is way too harsh on people of color, including and especially LGBTQ blacks and Latinos (80 percent of those stopped by police and frisked for weapons have been black or Latino, and 90 percent were found to have done nothing wrong). But just because a law most heavily affects a certain population doesn’t mean that it only affects those people, or doesn’t affect another group differently. This excellent article — and by excellent I mean troubling — documents the experience of some of the 46,784 women who were stopped and 16,000 who were frisked in New York alone last year (guns were found in only 59 cases). In most cases, the people carrying out these stops and frisks were men, as more than 80 percent of officers on patrol are men in New York. From the article:

“When officers conduct stops upon shaky or baseless legal foundations, people of both sexes often say they felt violated. Yet stops of women by male officers can often involve an additional element of embarrassment and perhaps sexual intimidation, according to women who provided their accounts of being stopped by the police. And many incorrectly believe that the police, like Transportation Security Administration officers, are required to have female officers frisk women.”

Go read the whole thing. And join the movement against Stop+Frisk in New York. (hint: it’s working!).


http://feministing.com/2012/08/07/quick-hit-the-effects-of-stop-frisk-on-women/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I was just coming to post this obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #1
hadn't even thought of that but really good point La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #2
Either public gropings by the police are wrong for everyone 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #3
did you read the article? that's not what it's saying La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #4
Men can be abused too 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #5
no one is saying that women should be exempt La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #6
I think stop and frisk is unconstitutional obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #7
It probably is 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #8
Too frigging bad -- they can hire more female cops obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #9
They would have to start drafting them 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #10
Too bad, then obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #16
The NYPD has 34,500 officers LadyHawkAZ Aug 2012 #13
I agree that it is (or ought to be) unconstitutional 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #14
No LadyHawkAZ Aug 2012 #15
LLP -- just saw this related article on my twitter feed obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #11
Women have the right to be frisked by a woman officer REP Aug 2012 #12
I think part of why theyre doing this is so they can continue to make pot posession arrests Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»For Women in Street Stops...»Reply #11