Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

(28,107 posts)

9. That's what I think, too

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:37 PM

Aug 2012

Volleyball costs them money, cheerleading doesn't, plus it has a bit of the "T & A" thing going on.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just Because Cheerleading Is Hard Doesn’t Mean It’s a Sport [View all] obamanut2012 Aug 2012 OP

I am one of those who questions anything judged as a sport ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #1

I agree with you 100% on all of this obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #2

it's a huge stretch for me to see chearleading as a sport La Lioness Priyanka Aug 2012 #3

Actually the marching band does ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #5

It's being rebranded as "acrobatics and tumbling" at some schools Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #7

I'm sorry, I don't understand the question. Gormy Cuss Aug 2012 #12

That's what I think, too obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #9

Why would competitive cheer leading not cost the school money? ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #10

Because they are tied to teh football program at most schools obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #11

That varies from school to school ProgressiveProfessor Aug 2012 #13

It is usually tied to the football program funding obamanut2012 Aug 2012 #14

Hmmm - I guess volleyball is more recognized as a sport TBF Aug 2012 #15