Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
17. 4th law, that was not the implication of the comment.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:17 AM
Sep 2012

The joke about a men's counterpart was pointing out that such a thing would never happen and it's because of sexism, not market forces.

For the final time in this thread I would like to remind you to read the SOP of this group. Deflecting attention away from the topic, not by supplying facts but by suggesting possible explanations that boil down to "it's not sexism" is inherently a violation of the SOP. It's not the first time that you have been warned about this and I'm sorry to say that it's time to block your participation in this group.

Gormy Cuss, host of Feminists Group.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Enough with the bikini sp...»Reply #17