Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Health

Showing Original Post only (View all)

sl8

(16,276 posts)
Thu Aug 22, 2024, 05:44 AM Aug 2024

Nearly 60% of baby foods in the U.S. don't meet nutritional guidelines, study says [View all]

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/22/nx-s1-5086251/nearly-60-of-baby-foods-in-the-u-s-dont-meet-nutritional-guidelines-study-says

Nearly 60% of baby foods in the U.S. don't meet nutritional guidelines, study says

AUGUST 22, 2024 5:49 AM ET
By Ayana Archie

Nearly 60% of food products made for toddlers and babies did not meet nutrition standards set by the World Health Organization, according to a new study.

Researchers tested 651 products in 2023, across eight food retailers in North Carolina, including Kroger, Walmart, Costco, Ahold Delhaize, Publix, Sam’s Club, Target and Aldi. Other samples were included from the websites of Safeway and H-E-B.

Only about 30% of products complied with the agency’s protein recommendations, while 56% were compliant with sugar guidelines. About 93% of the products aligned with the fat recommendations, according to the study that was published in the Nutrients journal Wednesday.

About 1 in 4 products did not meet calorie requirements and about 20% exceeded recommended sodium limits.

[...]



========

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/16/2782

An Evaluation of the Nutritional and Promotional Profile of Commercial Foods for Infants and Toddlers in the United States

[...]

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Nearly 60% of baby foods ...»Reply #0