Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:26 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
You are outside the SOP of this forum so I am blocking you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1152&pid=1341
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This response is quite the rude rejoinder to someone with a legitimate question "how would you respond..." to something that has been thrown at the poster.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:35 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How is this rude? A host of this group is simply explaining why they are blocking this poster from a protected group.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A thread on pro choice and the friggen bible? Pleeze!!
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should be ashamed.
On Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:26 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
You are outside the SOP of this forum so I am blocking you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1152&pid=1341
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This response is quite the rude rejoinder to someone with a legitimate question "how would you respond..." to something that has been thrown at the poster.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:35 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How is this rude? A host of this group is simply explaining why they are blocking this poster from a protected group.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A thread on pro choice and the friggen bible? Pleeze!!
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should be ashamed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read