Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(19,183 posts)
1. A few random thoughts on this....
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 06:02 PM
Feb 2024

1. I wish her well, but I am not optimistic about this lawsuit's chances. I can just picture SC state legislators getting ready to amend this law as we speak, to remove any language that could be construed to conflict with the earlier cutoff they obviously intended. Still, more power to Shelton and Farris for their efforts. I really hope I'm wrong about their chances of success.

2. No matter which side wins or loses, I presume the decision will be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court. I find that rather ironic, since they said in the Dobbs decision that these matters should be left up to the states. If SCOTUS agrees to hear this (or any other cases related to post-Dobbs abortion bans), they might as well out up a sign outside their building saying, "Yeah, we lied when we said the states should decide."

3. Speaking of irony, this bit from the article jumped out at me:

“I don’t think it’s enough time for someone, clearly, to obtain an abortion,” Shelton said of the six-week interpretation.

As my daughter used to say, "No duh." I mean, let's be real: that's the whole point of this law and others like it. Set the cutoff for getting an abortion early enough in pregnancy, and the whole thing takes care of itself!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Pro-Choice»South Carolina woman seek...»Reply #1