Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnionPatch

(6,251 posts)
2. That's interesting. So it's possible, then.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 03:31 PM
Jan 2015

Thanks for the links. These families were Scottish but it sounds like this kind of thing wasn't limited to the Germans.

This man would have left the area of my ancestors right around when the youngest of his three children (if they were his children) was married. He seemingly left those married children (and a buried wife) behind and moved about 100 miles west, into Ohio where he married a second woman and proceeded to have five children with her. She was quite a bit younger than he. I found one of their descendants in my autosomal DNA matches but of course that's no proof, only a clue.

And yes the two batch of kids would definitely have been separated although one of the clues I found on this family was that a grandchild from each batch of his children migrated to Iowa in the mid-1800s possibly in the same wagon train, lived in the same town and were buried a block away from each other.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»A question about naming c...»Reply #2