Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ancestry/Genealogy

DebJ

(7,699 posts)

2. No the 1940 census was a big disappointment for me.

Reply to CanonRay (Original post)

Mon Sep 7, 2015, 11:07 PM

Sep 2015

Because prior years' censuses always asked some of those questions.

The 2010 census will be a HUGE bomb for future researchers. Not enough info on anything asked. Thanks W, you asshat, for slashing
the budget for the census and fear-mongering about it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ‘Secret’ Details in the 1940 Census You May Be Missing [View all] CanonRay Sep 2015 OP

My grandfather appears twice in the 1940 census WolverineDG Sep 2015 #1

I can top that one! Dem2theMax Sep 2015 #3

No the 1940 census was a big disappointment for me. DebJ Sep 2015 #2

What cracks me up about my ancestors is how DURHAM D Sep 2015 #4

While it may seem that ancestors were giving bad info HeiressofBickworth Sep 2015 #5

Really weird benld74 Feb 2016 #6

My paternal grandfather was not listed kdmorris Feb 2016 #7

I was just looking at that census this morning. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #8