Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
11. Just wanted to add...
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 10:37 AM
Apr 2012

I nearly got suckered this past weekend when I was searching out a particular branch of the family tree...specifically, Sarah Allen, whose family was killed in the Deerfield (MA) massacre.

She was kidnapped and brought to Kaughnawaga, where she was turned over to a merchant for domestic work, but five years later married Guillaume Lalonde, and was baptized with a French name, had 13 children and forever lived as a French Canadian woman.

Anyway, some people had her line going back to Henry II of England and Eleanor of Aquitaine.

I was thrilled...until I started really examining the "evidence".

Well, one of her "Allen ancestors" was, supposedly, a Cardinal of the Catholic church! But from him down there was no real evidence of any children, although going backward, his line did appear to reach back to royalty.

I'm so glad I checked this out before announcing to my family that we were related to Kings and Queens.

As it turned out, her grandfather was not born in England. He was born in Scotland, and most likely changed his name from Aluinn to Allen.

You really have to be careful...also what I notice a lot is that people will have ancestors in their trees and their parents are listed beneath them (the part where you can click to add people to your tree) but the parents' dates of birth are years after the birth of their alleged children. I saw one the other day where the kids were born in the 1500s and the "parents" were listed with birthdates in the 1800s.

Crazy! I would rather have the truth, even if it means my ancestors are NOT royalty.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Glad to find this group! [View all] shanti Mar 2012 OP
Welcome! Rosie1223 Mar 2012 #1
Cool stuff! pipi_k Mar 2012 #2
marie, yes shanti Mar 2012 #7
Genealogy is so much fun TuxedoKat Mar 2012 #3
History...yes! pipi_k Mar 2012 #4
What a small world!! kdmorris Mar 2012 #5
i took it back to Govert Van Doorsen shanti Mar 2012 #6
Some advice Spider Jerusalem Apr 2012 #8
That's one of the good things pipi_k Apr 2012 #9
bear with me here shanti Apr 2012 #10
Just wanted to add... pipi_k Apr 2012 #11
I've found a few instances of things like that tracing my own ancestry Spider Jerusalem Apr 2012 #12
Yeah, that's what I was thinking the other day pipi_k Apr 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»Glad to find this group!»Reply #11