Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,437 posts)
5. There's a lot of misunderstanding about what the proposed regulations say. Please see this:
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 02:58 PM
Nov 2018
Betsy DeVos set to bolster rights of accused in rewrite of sexual assault rules

By Laura Meckler
Reporter covering national education policy and trends, and the Education Department
November 14
....

The most significant change would guarantee the accused the right to cross-examine their accusers, though that would have to be conducted by advisers or attorneys for the people involved, rather than by the person accused of misconduct. If requested, the parties could be in separate rooms during the cross-examination, an administration official said. They said this was done to bolster the due-process rights of the accused while assuring that victims are not directly confronted by their assailants.

The Obama guidelines had strongly discouraged the use of direct cross-examination. The earlier DeVos draft allowed cross-examination but did not require schools to offer it as an option.
....

Laura Meckler is a national education writer covering national trends, federal policy and the Education Department. She came to The Washington Post from the Wall Street Journal, where her beats included presidential politics, the White House, health care, immigration and demographics. Follow https://twitter.com/laurameckler

Here's a pretty-much final draft of the proposed regulation:

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/title-ix-nprm.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But they will defend the rights of Nazis to stampede through Charlottesville Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #1
Are you kidding me? This is Devos' attempt to dismantle protections for sexual assault victims hlthe2b Nov 2018 #2
I see your point about this ruling Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #4
I don't always agree witht the cases ACLU takes, but 1st amendment does require them to hlthe2b Nov 2018 #11
They're under an obligation to defend civil liberties, not terrorism or violence Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #12
They aren't defending the Charlottesville groups against anything but 1st amendment rights... hlthe2b Nov 2018 #16
Please, they are and were just using "free speech" as a cover for violence Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #17
ACLU IS NOT defending violence. As you say, any idiot can also see that the right of assembly was hlthe2b Nov 2018 #18
You don't need a crystal ball of intent for these people Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #19
Using putlic impressions of fact even that we can all agree on, does not rise to the level of legal hlthe2b Nov 2018 #20
Who cares? Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #21
Because they are in business of defending civil rights IN COURT CHALLENGES. Do you not get that? hlthe2b Nov 2018 #22
Oh believe me, I let my concerns be known Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #23
Accusing me of spreading "horseshit" when I have been very polite trying to answer your concerns? hlthe2b Nov 2018 #24
I never said you did Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Nov 2018 #26
You think I don't know the ACLU's justification for their position? Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Nov 2018 #31
Oh Jesus Christ. You are hopeless. Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Nov 2018 #33
Um, nope. Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #34
Enjoy conversing to yourself . hlthe2b Nov 2018 #35
This is the second time you've said that Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #36
There's a lot of misunderstanding about what the proposed regulations say. Please see this: mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2018 #5
I am fully aware as I have the actual text and I totally agree with ACLU, with whom I have had hlthe2b Nov 2018 #6
Is the WaPo writer's interpretation wrong? mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2018 #7
It is being non-questioning of the intent and loopholes DeVos is building in... hlthe2b Nov 2018 #8
Full disclosure: I am not in the Betsy DeVos Fan Club. NT mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2018 #9
I wouldn't have expected you would be. I think there is concerted effort to confuse on this. hlthe2b Nov 2018 #10
And I'm glad they do Loki Liesmith Nov 2018 #37
I dare you to say that to Heather Heyer's mom. Downtown Hound Nov 2018 #38
My take is that they are against Betsy DeVos' Beakybird Nov 2018 #3
Right. elleng Nov 2018 #14
'But the ACLU opposes the new rules for campuses. elleng Nov 2018 #13
Bad headline, ACLU does NOT decline to defend civil rights. elleng Nov 2018 #15
Thank you for clarifying the ACLU's position. SharonClark Nov 2018 #29
You're welcome. elleng Nov 2018 #30
A bad headline. PoorMonger Nov 2018 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»The Atlantic: The ACLU De...»Reply #5