Federal Judge Finds National Security Letters Unconstitutional, Bans Them [View all]
Ultra-secret national security letters that come with a gag order on the recipient are an unconstitutional impingement on free speech, a federal judge in California ruled Friday.
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston ordered the government to stop issuing so-called NSLs across the board, in a stunning defeat for the Obama administrations surveillance practice. However, she also stayed her order for 90 days to give the government a chance to appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
We are very pleased that the Court recognized the fatal constitutional shortcomings of the NSL statute, said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Matt Zimmerman, whose organization is representing a telecom that received an NSL in 2011. The governments gags have truncated the public debate on these controversial surveillance tools. Our client looks forward to the day when it can publicly discuss its experience.
...
After the telecom challenged the NSL, the Justice Department took its own extraordinary measure and sued the company, arguing in court documents that the company was violating the law by challenging its authority....
complete piece:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/nsl-found-unconstitutional/
(Government claims it is illegal to challenge laws in court
![](/emoticons/crazy.gif)
)