Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Solly Mack

(93,525 posts)
6. It offers federal protections but if Obergefell falls, states that want to discriminate can, yes
Wed Nov 16, 2022, 06:06 PM
Nov 2022

It's not a cure-all, no. Not a complete relief.

The worry remains.

With this SCOTUS, Obergefell could be overturned. Believe me, I know all too well what harm this SCOTUS is capable of causing.


The protections it offers are important, however.

More from the article -

Under the Respect for Marriage Act, “if Obergefell or Loving were to fall, and some states decided to no longer marry same-sex or interracial couples, the federal government would continue to recognize marriages legally entered into in other states,” the organization explains.

Also, the act would assure that “marriages, adoption orders, divorce decrees, and other public acts must be honored by all states consistent with the Full Faith and Credit clause of the U.S. Constitution. This adds additional protection for married couples and families,” it continues. “Legally married couples who experience a denial of their legal rights should be able to seek support from the U.S. Attorney General rather than having to clog the court system litigating incident by incident.”






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looking forward to this discussion. ShazzieB Nov 2022 #1
Here's a decent article on how things could play out. Solly Mack Nov 2022 #2
So it's exactly as I thought - it still allows states to discriminate. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #5
It offers federal protections but if Obergefell falls, states that want to discriminate can, yes Solly Mack Nov 2022 #6
I think the fed protections are a good thing. Very much so. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #7
That is one of the many questions - how it plays out on the state level Solly Mack Nov 2022 #8
No one I'm discussing this with gets that. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #9
You need to look at two cases: 1) as it is now and 2) if the SC over turns same sex marriage rights karynnj Nov 2022 #3
I'm not asking for this law to not go through.... BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #4
It isn't a step backwards. Just a tiny step forward as laws go. ColinC Nov 2022 #10
But isn't it giving states the right to deny you a marriage license? BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #11
It is. Which is how it is already as far as the laws on the books. ColinC Nov 2022 #12
What good is the progress if, in order to be protected by it, I have to take a vacation to get it? BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #14
That's kinda how progress works unfortunately ColinC Nov 2022 #15
You're not wrong. At all. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #17
It is not a step backwards because it ONLY has consequence if the SC acts karynnj Nov 2022 #13
I guess I don't see it this way. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #16
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»LGBT Civil Rights and Activism»Does this new law allow s...»Reply #6