Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT Civil Rights and Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 06:32 PM Dec 2012

Apparently Scalia Missed the Whole UNANIMOUS Decision in Loving v. VA [View all]

That would be a decision made despite a lot of people had "moral" feelings opposing interracial marriage. Or Lawrence v. TX where a lot of people had "moral" feelings opposing gay sex in the privacy of one's home. You know, where the the GOP generally says it wants to limit government intrusion.

Yes, Scalia. People should be able to have moral objections to homosexuality. That is their right. But when you compare that to moral objections to murder you are wrong and evil.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bravo fightthegoodfightnow Dec 2012 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»LGBT Civil Rights and Activism»Apparently Scalia Missed ...»Reply #0