Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Drug Policy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(63,288 posts)
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 08:30 AM Dec 2014

Congressional Spending Bill Blocks D.C. From Legalizing Marijuana [View all]

Congressional Spending Bill Blocks D.C. From Legalizing Marijuana

When we say "no taxation without representation," we mean you. Hooray for small government.

Sarah Anne Hughes in News on Dec 9, 2014 10:25 pm

Because they can, Congress is attempting to block D.C. from legalizing marijuana as part of a $1.1 trillion spending bill, directly ignoring the will of 65 percent of local voters.

"None of the funds contained in this Act may be used to enact any law, rule, or regulation to legalize or otherwise reduce penalties associated with the possession, Controlled Substances Act or any tetrahydrocannabinols derivative for recreational purposes," the spending bill states. That language comes from Maryland Rep. Andy Harris, who previous attempted to defund D.C.'s marijuana decriminalization law. Decriminalization is not specifically mentioned in the spending bill, but a press release from the House Appropriations Committee makes this clear: The bill "prohibits both federal and local funds from being used to implement a referendum legalizing recreational marijuana use in the District."

The riders don't stop there. The bill also includes a provision that would force the D.C. Council to add a so-called "conscience clause" allowing health insurance providers to not cover contraception.

Nothing in this Act may be construed to prevent the Council or Mayor of the District of Columbia from addressing the issue of the provision of contraceptive coverage by health insurance plans, but it is the intent of Congress that any legislation enacted on such issue should include a ‘‘conscience clause’’ which provides exceptions for religious beliefs and moral convictions.

....
But perhaps nothing — nothing! — can top the absurdity of the following rider, which has been included before:

None of the Federal funds contained in this Act may be used by the District of Columbia Attorney General or any other officer or entity of the District government to provide assistance for any petition drive or civil action which seeks to require Congress to provide for voting representation in Congress for the District of Columbia.

The last colony, indeed.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DC is always and has always been regulated by pipoman Dec 2014 #1
YOU might not....but the people living there VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #3
I get that pipoman Dec 2014 #4
NO you don't get that VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #5
No, you apparently don't get it pipoman Dec 2014 #6
I live in the area and I do get it.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #7
Do you know what a slave is? pipoman Dec 2014 #8
The cost of keeping MJ criminal is much higher than de-crim. GreatGazoo Dec 2014 #2
D.C. scrambles to preserve pot legalization law gutted by Congress mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2014 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #10
Why the fear? Luxadvector Feb 2015 #11
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Drug Policy»Congressional Spending Bi...»Reply #0