Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The AMA opposes any law that bars doctors from having conversations about gun safety, do you agree? [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)88. I often discuss firearms and target shooting with my doctors and dentists. ...
Several are hunters or target shooters.
I have used the discussion of firearms with a couple of doctors to successfully avoid their tendency to stick a finger up my ass to check my prostate gland.
I see no problem with a doctor discussing firearm safety with me or telling parents how important it is to secure firearms in their home so that young children can not find and play with them. However I do oppose recording the fact that I own firearms in my medical records. Eventually our medical system will move to electronic health records.
Electronic health record
An electronic health record (EHR) is a systematic collection of electronic health information about an individual patient or population.[1] It is a record in digital format that is theoretically capable of being shared across different health care settings. In some cases this sharing can occur by way of network-connected, enterprise-wide information systems and other information networks or exchanges. EHRs may include a range of data, including demographics, medical history, medication and allergies, immunization status, laboratory test results, radiology images, vital signs, personal statistics like age and weight, and billing information.
The system is designed to represent data that accurately captures the state of the patient at all times. It allows for an entire patient history to be viewed without the need to track down the patients previous medical record volume and assists in ensuring data is accurate, appropriate and legible. It reduces the chances of data replication as there is only one modifiable file, which means the file is constantly up to date when viewed at a later date and eliminates the issue of lost forms or paperwork. Due to all the information being in a single file, it makes it much more effective when extracting medical data for the examination of possible trends and long term changes in the patient.
Privacy concerns
***snip***
Privacy concerns in healthcare apply to both paper and electronic records. According to the Los Angeles Times, roughly 150 people (from doctors and nurses to technicians and billing clerks) have access to at least part of a patient's records during a hospitalization, and 600,000 payers, providers and other entities that handle providers' billing data have some access also.[56] Recent revelations of "secure" data breaches at centralized data repositories, in banking and other financial institutions, in the retail industry, and from government databases, have caused concern about storing electronic medical records in a central location.[57] Records that are exchanged over the Internet are subject to the same security concerns as any other type of data transaction over the Internet...emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_health_record
If the fact that I own firearms can be found in my medical records it might lead to an increase in the cost of my healthcare insurance and in some cases make obtaining such insurance more difficult. It might also be used as a de facto form of registration.
I also feel that a doctor should never be allowed to deny treatment to a patient based solely on the fact that he/she owns firearms. Nor should a pediatrician deny care to a child because the parent or parents are gun owners. Of course no good doctor would ever do so. However I see no problem if the doctor expresses his intense dislike of firearms to his patients. My doctors have never feared expressing their views that they find problems with my lifestyle that it would be wise for me to correct.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The AMA opposes any law that bars doctors from having conversations about gun safety, do you agree? [View all]
CreekDog
Mar 2014
OP
I think doctors should not have any bans on any conversations with their patients.
lostincalifornia
Mar 2014
#1
I think the AAP's position on that amounts to the same position that the far right
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#138
Safe storage is hardly 'gun control', when you suggest the individual do it.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#142
Some pediatricians have told anti-vaxxer parents that they will have to find another provider
Tanuki
Mar 2014
#19
A reality being imposed upon all of society to perpetuate the myth of a pretend "right."
Loudly
Mar 2014
#73
If you're going to spread untruths, and expect not to be called on it, do it somewhere else.
beevul
Mar 2014
#92
Do you have functional hands? Then you have "convenient means of depriving others...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#51
Yet we have fewer murders today than back when it was "up close and personal"
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#112
No doubt the situation would have been better if dad hadn't had a gun
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#119
but you talk about gun safety all the time and you don't have the medical background to talk
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#5
so you're saying if someone gets shot by a gun, they shouldn't go to the hospital
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#45
No, it's that once someone is shot, the gun safety aspects become irrelevant.
Lizzie Poppet
Mar 2014
#71
speaking of your background, I'd like to ask whether you're a liberal or conservative
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#72
you said you take each issue on its merits, but you don't actually post on other issues
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#76
I'm just trying to understand you, you're saying that you're liberal and you post liberal things
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#89
They're merely the latest self-appointed zampolit/witchfinder/inquisitor...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#118
I realize that you're deeply offended when you're asked on DU what your political position is
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#56
Remember, they *have* to post here- the other group gets far less traffic
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#64
What I oppose is a Government mandate that Doctors report the content of those conversations
SkatmanRoth
Mar 2014
#46
I don't think there should be any law barring doctors from asking about lifestyle,
uncommonlink
Mar 2014
#50
I can't imagine how the need to wear eye and ear protection when shooting would even come up
Jgarrick
Mar 2014
#81
If they can ban this subject, they can ban abortion discussion by the same mechanism.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#93
no, how about you acknowledge the rules and stop trying to negotiate new ones?
CreekDog
Mar 2014
#155
The AMA should oppose doctors who deny services to patients who don't want to talk about guns
aikoaiko
Mar 2014
#123
So, whose job should it have been to talk to the parents of this dead 2 year old?
3catwoman3
Mar 2014
#154