Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: "Nobody wants to take your guns..." [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)77. No. Just no. Its your filter thats broken.
Most "controllers", as you like to call them, do support 2A, though perhaps not the current interpretation by the gun happy RW SCOTUS.
Being opposed to gun shops in the inner city is NOT the same as wanting to take your guns away. Just as not wanting adult video stores, strip clubs and brothels in downtown Mayberry, is not a cry to outlaw sex, prostitution and pornography.
Being opposed to gun shops in the inner city is NOT the same as wanting to take your guns away. Just as not wanting adult video stores, strip clubs and brothels in downtown Mayberry, is not a cry to outlaw sex, prostitution and pornography.
Hands off my goalposts, kthx.
First of all, I didn't use the term 'controller' in the post you are replying to. Check your own damn reality filter.
Second, Shannon watts said this in the above video:
"Our message is that, you know first of all, were not anti-gun, we support the second amendment. My grandparents...Ah my grandfathers in fact, were world war 2 veterans um who were very avid hunters, so we are in no way anti-gun..."
Opposing a gun shop opening in a place where ALL backgrounds are checked, is anti-gun and theres no way to spin it otherwise. If they were HONEST about not being anti-gun, they'd have said "This is great. we applaud this shop locating in a venue where background checks are 100 percent, rather than somewhere else that they aren't."
But they didn't do that.
You lot are so cute, when you try to pretend that taking away someones opportunities to aquire a gun - taking the gun before anyone even has a chance to get one - is meaningfully different from taking a gun someone already has.
But you're even more cute when you deny the reality that's right in front of you staring you in the face.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I seriously doubt that gangbangers et al would be treated as an exception
Starboard Tack
Aug 2014
#16
I think it is you who misses the point. And the canard canard again. LOL!
Starboard Tack
Aug 2014
#26
"If there were no guns available, then how would the gangbangers acquire them?"
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#42
it's really going to happen isn't it? we can't even get sensible gun control let alone getting rid
samsingh
Aug 2014
#2
The guns that they are fighting hardest to ban are involved in less than 300 murders/yr.
benEzra
Aug 2015
#55
"Through each war we are in, combatants have become more and more willing to shoot to kill."
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#43
And a liberal criminologist destroys the "Nobody wants to take your guns" meme
pablo_marmol
Aug 2014
#41