Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Bloomberg Spends $764,232.35 Buying Oregon Background Check Bill [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)61. You'll call anything you don't agree with 'right wing ideology'.
Why is this 'beevul' character allowed to post here on DEMOCRAT UNDERGROUND, when he 1) consistently posts far rightwing ideology
You'll call anything you don't agree with 'far right wing ideology'.
2) slanders & slurs democrats who support gun control efforts
In your anti-gun opinion. Of course you support the org which is funded by a known racist that worked directly against 2 great Democrats and was responsible in part at the least, for them losing to two tea party types. I'm tempted to say pot meet kettle, but in this case, the pot (james) stands alone.
3) has posted at least 9 posts on DU accusing gun control advocate & democrat Shannon Watts of what appears to be a false quote, two of which are OPs, and refuses to post a reputable source link for his ugly contention.
Yeah, nevermind that her group is funded by a known racist megalomaniac, and whos diligent efforts against Democrats led to two tea party types winning over those Democrats.
3) does not support background check legislation which over 95% of democrats do support, and uses far right nra reasoning to justify.
The astute reader will note that james posted this screed Mon Aug 31, 2015, 04:01 PM.
I invite the astute reader to note this also, that not much later in another thread, james says this:
While I will tentatively agree you now do not OPPOSE background checks, you do not SUPPORT either universal background checks, or bg checks in the current format, THAT is somewhat clear in your above postings despite your contradictions.
And I reply with this:
I'll make this plain. I DO support background checks at retail. My feelings on background checks on person to person sales is meh whatever, go right ahead. Even though I know its just going to lead to another fight, at some point, when the rest of you figure out what I and the DOJ and a whole lot of others figured out a long time ago: you need registration to make it work. And I know that fight is going to happen, because I do not support gun registration of any kind for any reason outside the NFA, and I never will.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=175246
4)He sometimes posts misleading information which puts liberal & democrat cities & people in a bad light, when it comes to gun violence, thus tending to glorify red states with scant gun control. A true democrat does not do these things with such venom & consistency as beevul does.
Again, your opinion. I think you see it as misleading, because A) its not anti-gun, so you must attack it, and B) you are so out of your depth with the subject matter that you don't understand what people are trying to say, and C) you use the reply system and paragraph format in ways nobody has ever seen, and assume yours is right and everyone elses is wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Theres a difference between namecalling, and describing accurately, many gun control proponents...
beevul
Aug 2015
#19
You were alerted on by guess who using the usual passive aggressive alert distortions.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#22
This is the wrong place for that post; you want 'Ask the Administrators', found at...
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#45
And thanks in return for *your* helpful hint! I altered the post title #47...
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#48
Shannon Watts helped to defeat Dems, why are you supporting her at DU?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#47
Ahem. This is DEMOCRATIC Underground, not Gun Control Underground...
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#50
I voted for Ed Markey and Liz Warren, both quite vocal gun control supporters
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#56
"MDA did not work...to get a republican elected" They worked to get Dems *un*-elected...
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#70
"MDA did not work against pryor or begich to get a republican elected" Bullshit!
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#67
Watts did not get *anyone* pro-control elected in those races. Where's the win?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#57
Bloomberg won, alright- just not the win his credulous supporters think he wanted
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#59
The NRA salutes you! Ammoland salutes you! Have you informed Ted Nugent of your brilliance?
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#21
Both Bloomberg and Tom Steyer as billionaires made a difference in Oregon's election in 2014...
cascadiance
Aug 2015
#29