Gun Control & RKBA

Your idea of compromise is some gun control now, and yet more later. You want gun rights proponents to concede issues, without gun control advocates doing likewise. A belief that firearm laws are already too lenient is totally irrelevant. Compromise requires both sides to offer something. The inability to actually seek compromise is all the more astonishing in light of the fact that, as you clearly acknowledge, gun rights proponents are undoubtedly winning, electorally, legislatively, and judicially, and your side has virtually no leverage.

Forget about national concealed carry reciprocity (although that's one of the few items that the gun rights side has currently been unable to achieve). What are you willing to give up that the other side wants, and what would you reasonably expect in return that might actually improve gun safety (and pass constitutional muster).