Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Silicosys4

(26 posts)

5. Two (minimum) problems with that

Reply to SecularMotion (Original post)

Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:47 PM

Oct 2015

Last edited Sun Oct 25, 2015, 11:18 PM - Edit history (1)

1. Successful defensive uses of a gun are unmeasurable so stating any odds is a fallacy in itself,
2. As someone wiser than myself once explained to me,
It's not a question of odds it's a matter of what is at stake. For me, that is the lives of myself
and my family.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NRA Commentary Admits The Odds Of Needing A Gun To Defend Yourself Are Infinitesimal [View all] SecularMotion Oct 2015 OP

Media Matters? GGJohn Oct 2015 #1

They are slim that's for sure, but it's better to have and not need than need and die. ileus Oct 2015 #2

If there's no violent crime why did Brock violate Washington DC gun laws to illegally buy a gun? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #3

Because he knew MSM would never call his hand in it. They didn't. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #4

Two (minimum) problems with that Silicosys4 Oct 2015 #5