Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,717 posts)
5. long time no see
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:15 PM
Nov 2015

jmg: - they like the "common-sense" route Australia took but NOT the (important) part about the compulsory buybacks and new laws to make the bought-back guns illegal??

Australia has only about 3 million guns for its ~20 million aussies. America has 100 times more guns (300 mill), what would work in Oz will not work in USA. What with the subversion of the 2ndA in 2008 it would be hard to enact laws to outlaw a particular type of firearm due to buybacks.

HClinton: “The Australian government, as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of automatic weapons, offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns. Then they basically clamped down going forward in terms of having more of a background check approach, more of a permitting approach,” she said. “But they believed, and I think the evidence supports them, by offering to buy back those guns they were able to curtail the supply and to set a different standard for gun purchases in the future.”

jmg: So how do they want to deal with the millions and millions and millions of guns out there? (be they handguns or semi-autos) Through "restrictions on possession"? What does that mean???

The article did recommend these possible solutions, and remember all that can be reasonably expected by gun control efforts is a marginal reduction in violent crime:

◦Restrictions (not a ban) on the sale and possession of handguns, which were used in 5,562 of the 8,124 gun homicides reported by the FBI for last year.
◦Mandatory universal background checks on all firearm purchases.
◦A federal database that includes those individuals that the states have determined are not mentally capable of handling weapons.
◦A means to report family members or friends whose behavior leads one to suspect that they may harm themselves or others which would lead to a temporary suspension (10 days) of their right to posses a gun pending an investigation.
◦A removal of the NRA-dictated gag on federal research into gun violence.
◦The repeal of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields gun manufacturers from the same negligence and product liability lawsuits that every other manufacturer in the United States must face.


Anyhow, where you been old friend? long time no see.

Believe in what fits your narrative, the rest be damned. nt edgineered Nov 2015 #1
This stuff covers so much it confuses me - they like the "common-sense" route Australia took jmg257 Nov 2015 #2
long time no see jimmy the one Nov 2015 #5
If a gun manufacturer sells a defective Snobblevitch Nov 2015 #6
Define 'defective'. flamin lib Nov 2015 #16
Define 'no mechanical safety'. beevul Nov 2015 #18
That's interesting because Snobblevitch Nov 2015 #19
The Glock is not defective because it is designed to function as it does. flamin lib Nov 2015 #20
*All* guns are dangerous when misused, Glocks included. "Glock leg" is the result of misuse friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #24
Once upon a time, I got in an argument with my father over computers... beevul Nov 2015 #28
Glock leg is caused by pulling the trigger Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #27
They do have a mechanical safety Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #26
I won't lose any sleep over you jimmy the one Nov 2015 #21
You must be a great Snobblevitch Nov 2015 #22
Hey Jimmy - I'm OK! More ASAP. nt jmg257 Nov 2015 #7
rawle tucker story miller cruik & presser jimmy the one Nov 2015 #23
"Iceberg dead ahead!" Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #3
So now you're saying people do want to take away guns??? ileus Nov 2015 #4
Quite frankly, Kang Colby Nov 2015 #8
The site at the OP's link turned off commenting. Typical controller behavior friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #9
Some days I wish DU would turn off commenting. SecularMotion Nov 2015 #10
"Some days I wish DU would turn off commenting." That says much about you, little of it flattering. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #11
If you choose to stop posting your Snobblevitch Nov 2015 #12
I do not think Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #14
Sarcasm? No, it was a moment of unguarded candor friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #17
No one you say, a scare tactic?? virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #13
I still cannot believe Hillary said that TeddyR Nov 2015 #15
Ummm, my guns are an AR-15, an 18-round competition 9mm pistol, benEzra Nov 2015 #25
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»No One is Talking About T...»Reply #5