Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: 13-year-old SC boy shoots and kills intruder while home alone [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)68. perhaps this one better
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheshire,_Connecticut,_home_invasion_murders
compared to this one
http://www.news9.com/story/19858704/12-year-old-girl-shoots-intruder-during-home-invasion
On a follow up, the guy she shot is a known sex offender.
and 14 isn't really a child, they are young adults. If treated and brought up as such, they will act as such.
compared to this one
http://www.news9.com/story/19858704/12-year-old-girl-shoots-intruder-during-home-invasion
On a follow up, the guy she shot is a known sex offender.
and 14 isn't really a child, they are young adults. If treated and brought up as such, they will act as such.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I would consider two guys breaking into my home not a perceived threat, but an actual threat.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#60
Your attitude is precisely why cops have gotten away with murder for so many years.
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#34
"Only thing...attacked was the door:" Only thing torpedoed was Lusitania's hull plating.
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#54
Not for these guys: lethal force is always justified whenever a threat exists (real or perceived)
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#24
I've actually BEEN in that situation. (warning: way more than one sentence)
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#91
If you consider an intelligent, properly spelled, properly punctuated, literate reply
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#118
He didn't *have* to run out the front door, SC's "castle doctrine" laws
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#84
You STILL don't get it, and continue to defend criminals, so all I can say is...
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#97
Since you believe that the child is guilty, and the other two are innocent.
oneshooter
Nov 2015
#116
Hell, he can't even get the story right, and keeps defending the criminals
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#115
Could have run out the front door into the other two guys breaking in from the front.
beardown
Nov 2015
#117
Damn, I swear to God I have debated you before in a dark, damp hole in a rock.
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#27
The fact that they were trying to break in and shoot inside the house PROVE that they were a threat.
beevul
Nov 2015
#30
And always leave a loaded gun or two lying around when you leave your kids home alone.
stone space
Nov 2015
#53
No, I don't think he should risk his life, that's why I asked why he didn't leave.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#73
There's really no point to this conversation, you are creating your own facts.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#75
LOL it is amusing too see them flip out about stories of this nature..
virginia mountainman
Nov 2015
#72
You don't want a debate -- you want only to attempt to humiliate your "opponents."
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#104
Breaking into an occupied residential dwelling is considered a potentially lethal threat
branford
Nov 2015
#96