Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: 13-year-old SC boy shoots and kills intruder while home alone [View all]Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)92. Obviously you don't "get" *anything* about this subject...
We can tell from your previous comment:
In the actual case, the kid could have run out the front door to the neighbors and called the police.
He had no idea who these people were. If it was a repair team at the wrong house, he would have been guilty of manslaughter.
He had no idea who these people were. If it was a repair team at the wrong house, he would have been guilty of manslaughter.
A repair team at the wrong house would have been knocking on the front door a couple of times, then left a "SORRY WE MISSED YOU" doorknob hanger, like we used to do when I installed/repaired cable tv. They WOULD NOT have been trying to break down the back door. But you already know that...
It is also very telling that you offer no sympathy for the 13 year old BOY, who will probably have nightmares & need counseling for a while.
I have seen NUMEROUS POSTS where people have the mistaken notion that gun owners "sit around all day, every day, just waiting for the chance to kill another human being", when nothing could be further from the truth. The decision to end the life of another human being is not one that comes easily, unless you are a sociopath, and often leaves the shooter with severe mental anguish, including nightmares and PTSD.
Ghost
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I would consider two guys breaking into my home not a perceived threat, but an actual threat.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#60
Your attitude is precisely why cops have gotten away with murder for so many years.
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#34
"Only thing...attacked was the door:" Only thing torpedoed was Lusitania's hull plating.
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#54
Not for these guys: lethal force is always justified whenever a threat exists (real or perceived)
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#24
I've actually BEEN in that situation. (warning: way more than one sentence)
Lizzie Poppet
Nov 2015
#91
If you consider an intelligent, properly spelled, properly punctuated, literate reply
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#118
He didn't *have* to run out the front door, SC's "castle doctrine" laws
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#84
You STILL don't get it, and continue to defend criminals, so all I can say is...
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#97
Since you believe that the child is guilty, and the other two are innocent.
oneshooter
Nov 2015
#116
Hell, he can't even get the story right, and keeps defending the criminals
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2015
#115
Could have run out the front door into the other two guys breaking in from the front.
beardown
Nov 2015
#117
Damn, I swear to God I have debated you before in a dark, damp hole in a rock.
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#27
The fact that they were trying to break in and shoot inside the house PROVE that they were a threat.
beevul
Nov 2015
#30
And always leave a loaded gun or two lying around when you leave your kids home alone.
stone space
Nov 2015
#53
No, I don't think he should risk his life, that's why I asked why he didn't leave.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#73
There's really no point to this conversation, you are creating your own facts.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#75
LOL it is amusing too see them flip out about stories of this nature..
virginia mountainman
Nov 2015
#72
You don't want a debate -- you want only to attempt to humiliate your "opponents."
Buzz Clik
Nov 2015
#104
Breaking into an occupied residential dwelling is considered a potentially lethal threat
branford
Nov 2015
#96