Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Assault Weapons [View all]branford
(4,462 posts)18. The thumbhole stocks and barrel shroud rationale is even more disturbing.
Apparently, they would rather people own "rapid firing" rifles that are more difficult to control when firing.
It seems that LCGPV believes inaccuracy and increased danger to bystanders is a feature, not a bug.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh god now we will be treated to the list of why there is no such think as an assault weapon
upaloopa
Nov 2015
#1
Well get a Dem congress and the backing of people and we can get some new laws.
upaloopa
Nov 2015
#3
<face palm> It's precisely stupidity like "assault weapon" bans that prevent us from
pablo_marmol
Nov 2015
#24
I'd really like to buy a military style assault-weapon. Never shot an automatic firearm before.
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#10
What appeals to me is they are accurate, modular, low recoil, variety of calibers than can be
Waldorf
Nov 2015
#14
Au contraire, IMO a poke in the eye to the self-important is always a good thing...
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2015
#41
Mine isn't M16 style, and you well know that they aren't select-fire like the M16.
benEzra
Nov 2015
#37
don't need to. We can pass an assult weapons ban given the right congressional make up
upaloopa
Nov 2015
#46
What do we do about the millions of semi-auto rifles already in circulation?
Snobblevitch
Nov 2015
#62