Gun Control & RKBA

True- but beside the point. Carrying a gun gives a person more options, and the subject
of the OP found one to be useful.



The point was (for those unfamiliar with statistics) that licensed CHL holders are less
likely to murder and/or commit other crimes than the either cops or the public at large.

Thus, your views on the desirability of the practice are strictly your opinion
and not borne out by empirical evidence of harm (or lack thereof) in this case.

Your views on the efficacy of the practice are, of course, entirely valid and you are
free to express them.

In a free polity, given the lack of demonstrable harm, they are not valid
as a guidline for public policy. Nor should they be.



Which is why both John Hendricks and myself both strongly urge training, and practical, live, range testing made a prerequisite for concealed carriage licensure.

The disintested reader will note that many other, if not most, progun posters here
feel the same way.



In an industrial society, you will find that most, if not, all activity eventually benefits
large industries.

Internet use not excepted of course...



That is your opinion, and you are free to expound it- and we are free to disagree.