...security considerations should begin with a safety and risk assessment. Threats, responses and means of mitigating these are considered and a plan to implement these responses and mitigating measures is developed. The plan would always include a schedule and a budget.
This would be considered a pro-gun response in that security measures, including the addition of armed security and/or arming present faculty and staff would be involved. There has been no push for this.
Disarming the nation as a whole or somehow expanding BGCs a mandating addition security from parents of students regarding weapons and supervision hasn't happened. No concerted plan to respond to a Columbine type incident has been forwarded and campaigned for on the part of pro-control.
My only conclusion, over 15 years after Dave Kopel wrote this article, is that from the president to the present day students' parents, everyone is comfortable with the current state of school security being the same as it was on 20 April 1999 for the most part.
I get the idea that public areas like the Walmart parking lot or public side walk in Time Square are places where you 'take your chances and roll your own dice' so to speak. The fact that we have designated "drug/gun free" zones means we think of those places as different and special. The fact that no change or even plan of improvement exists tells me that they're just not that special.
I hope there are no events any time soon and certainly no shootings at schools but whenever all these mouths, Watts, Nugent, Bloomberg, LaPierre, Feinstein, Rubio, Clinton, start talking again about some event, I'll know they're just looking for attention and don't really give a shit.