Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
3. There are two issues with this from my POV...
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jan 2016

1) ON EDIT - 41P removes CLEO sign off. My first point was incorrect.

2) We will see what the ATF opinion or advisory is about private sales as referenced within this fact sheet. The full working details of what makes someone a "dealer" aren't defined in this fact sheet. The fact sheet states that there will not be a set number of sales but it could be as little as two if other criteria are met. The fact sheet doesn't explain what the other criteria are but I assume the yet to be released ATF opinion will. It's possible ATF won't provide anymore clarification than what's in this fact sheet. If so, this is nothing more than an attempt to make existing law more ambiguous than it already is to scare people out of conducting private sales.

All in all, it could have been a lot worse. I was expecting more import related tomfoolery akin to George H.W. Bush's 922r.

If that's what it truly is, GGJohn Jan 2016 #1
The only possible objection I have is to make the DoD use smart technology on weapons Big_Mike Jan 2016 #2
There are two issues with this from my POV... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #3
Whew, thank god you are OK with it! Wow, makes me feel so much better. nt Logical Jan 2016 #4
Thanks. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #5
I am an unusual gun owner I will admit....... Logical Jan 2016 #6
Wow, I actually agree with everything you said here with one exception, GGJohn Jan 2016 #7
The government know a lot about all of us. Knowing about my guns might help track them..... Logical Jan 2016 #10
About the NRA, GGJohn Jan 2016 #11
I agree with you. I imagine most their members are not racist. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #13
I think the reasonable concern with registration is mission creep. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #18
These Obama proposals are OK in general, but that mission creep... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #20
Dealer DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #14
That's the long running point of contention. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #15
If you regularly DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #16
In my opinion, yes. n/t Kang Colby Jan 2016 #19
Me too DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #25
IMO, defining "dealers" is a state matter, much like selling cars... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #21
I agree completely with that. DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #24
Well, Logical.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #8
He's just inexplicably snippy with some of us. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #22
Weird to focus on Trusts bolus Jan 2016 #9
Welcome to DU. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #12
It's for PR impact. Straw Man Jan 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #17
It's a start, and I believe that he will do more mwrguy Jan 2016 #26
I think he pretty much did everything he could legally do. Straw Man Jan 2016 #27
those are all good ideas beergood Jan 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Details of Executive Acti...»Reply #3