Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
15. That's the long running point of contention.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:22 PM
Jan 2016
The term “dealer” is defined at 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(11)(A) to include any person engaged in the business of selling firearms at wholesale or retail. The term “engaged in the business” as applied to a dealer in firearms means a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms. A dealer can be “engaged in the business” without taking title to the firearms that are sold. However, the term does not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms. 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(21)(C).


https://www.atf.gov/file/55456/download
If that's what it truly is, GGJohn Jan 2016 #1
The only possible objection I have is to make the DoD use smart technology on weapons Big_Mike Jan 2016 #2
There are two issues with this from my POV... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #3
Whew, thank god you are OK with it! Wow, makes me feel so much better. nt Logical Jan 2016 #4
Thanks. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #5
I am an unusual gun owner I will admit....... Logical Jan 2016 #6
Wow, I actually agree with everything you said here with one exception, GGJohn Jan 2016 #7
The government know a lot about all of us. Knowing about my guns might help track them..... Logical Jan 2016 #10
About the NRA, GGJohn Jan 2016 #11
I agree with you. I imagine most their members are not racist. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #13
I think the reasonable concern with registration is mission creep. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #18
These Obama proposals are OK in general, but that mission creep... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #20
Dealer DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #14
That's the long running point of contention. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #15
If you regularly DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #16
In my opinion, yes. n/t Kang Colby Jan 2016 #19
Me too DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #25
IMO, defining "dealers" is a state matter, much like selling cars... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #21
I agree completely with that. DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #24
Well, Logical.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #8
He's just inexplicably snippy with some of us. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #22
Weird to focus on Trusts bolus Jan 2016 #9
Welcome to DU. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #12
It's for PR impact. Straw Man Jan 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #17
It's a start, and I believe that he will do more mwrguy Jan 2016 #26
I think he pretty much did everything he could legally do. Straw Man Jan 2016 #27
those are all good ideas beergood Jan 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Details of Executive Acti...»Reply #15