Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What if instead of a gun-owner-registry, there were a national gun-registry? [View all]hack89
(39,179 posts)74. Hold on a second
first off, a bunch of gang bangers with no military training do not constitute a national emergency even if they have automatic weapons. With no tactical or marksmanship training, they would be just wasting bullets.
secondly, big city SWAT teams are trained to military standards - they are truly specialized. And if they needed back up, the FBI has some excellent SWAT teams.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What if instead of a gun-owner-registry, there were a national gun-registry? [View all]
DetlefK
Jan 2016
OP
Which has squat to do with them opposing registration due to privacy concerns. eom.
GGJohn
Jan 2016
#87
That's because all land is purchased in a legal deed concept called "Fee Simple".
NutmegYankee
Jan 2016
#83
But acts of gun violence are exceedingly rare compared to the number guns and gun owners
hack89
Jan 2016
#62
So the Feds ignore heroin, cocaine and meth but will come down hard because of automatic weapons?
hack89
Jan 2016
#68
Why can't the Feds come down hard on the cartels and drug gangs using semi-automatic weapons?
hack89
Jan 2016
#69
My post was in response to your comments regarding Adam Lanza & Nancy Lanza ONLY
Lurks Often
Jan 2016
#106